Retirement Questions · Hypothetical case study
What Happens If My Retirement Doesn't Go According to Plan?
A retirement plan can still cover projected spending while leaving a smaller cushion than expected. Richard and Carol’s hypothetical case shows the effect of higher ongoing spending.
What if retirement changes?
Review the plan with the new information. In Richard and Carol’s hypothetical case, raising starting annual after-tax spending from $70,000 to $85,000 still left projected savings at age 90, but sharply reduced the amount left. This was an ongoing spending change that continued to rise with inflation.
A Plan That Works Today May Need to Change Tomorrow
You may have saved for years, picked a retirement date, and decided how much you want to spend. Prices, markets, expenses, and lifespan can change the picture. A plan may still cover spending while leaving much less savings later in life. Read the retirement savings case study.
Richard and Carol’s Story
Richard and Carol Evans are a hypothetical household approaching retirement with $900,000 in starting savings. Their original plan called for $70,000 in annual after-tax spending. SageonRQ evaluated their Current Plan and a Modeled Plan through Richard’s age 90.
Under the original assumptions, both plans supported projected spending through age 90. The Modeled Plan ended with $2,555,362 after taxes, compared with $2,504,161 under the Current Plan.
What If They Spend $15,000 More Each Year?
Richard and Carol then tested a higher starting annual spending target of $85,000. The additional $15,000 was an ongoing yearly increase, not a one-time emergency expense. Spending in each scenario continued to rise with inflation.
| Projected value at age 90 | $70,000 spending | $85,000 spending |
|---|---|---|
| Current Plan | $2,504,161 | $1,558,811 |
| Modeled Plan | $2,555,362 | $1,562,039 |
| Modeled advantage | +$51,201 | +$3,228 |
The higher spending scenario reduced projected Modeled net-of-tax ending value by $993,323, approximately 38.9%. Both scenarios still projected savings remaining at age 90, but the higher spending left a substantially smaller financial cushion. The two Audits used different spending inputs, and the engine may have selected different modeled strategies. This is not a controlled test holding every modeled variable constant.
Why Did an Extra $15,000 Matter So Much?
The extra spending happened every year, beginning with $15,000 more in annual after-tax spending and continuing through retirement as the spending target rose with inflation. That meant more withdrawals and less money left to grow.
This does not mean every household that spends $15,000 more will have the same projected outcome. It is the result for this hypothetical household under the assumptions used.
What Other Changes Could Affect Your Plan?
Higher inflation, lower investment returns, unexpected home or health expenses, a longer retirement, and future tax changes can all affect planning. These additional risks were not separately modeled in the Evans Audits. The measured comparison above tested the revised spending assumption.
What Can SageonRQ Show You?
The Retirement Opportunity Audit compares your current approach with a modeled strategy based on your information. It can help identify possible changes in projected after-tax value, lifetime taxes, required withdrawals, and Roth savings. The two Evans Audits show how a major change in spending can alter the long-term picture, even when neither plan runs out of savings.
Other planning choices may matter too. See the withdrawal-order case study and the Social Security timing article.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a higher spending target mean my plan will fail?
Not always. Richard and Carol still had projected savings at age 90 in both scenarios, though higher spending left much less at the end.
Is a one-time emergency the same as higher yearly spending?
No. A single expense and a lasting annual increase affect a plan differently. The Evans example tested higher ongoing spending.
Can SageonRQ predict market crashes or future tax laws?
No. Projections use assumptions and cannot predict every future event. The Evans Audits did not separately test those risks.
Should I reduce my spending now?
That depends on your goals, income, savings, and available choices. Reviewing your own plan can help you understand the tradeoffs.
Want to Explore Your Retirement Options Further?
Retirement Strategy Navigator is being developed to offer deeper year-by-year planning and comparisons of choices such as spending levels, retirement dates, and other assumptions. These are planned capabilities, not additional scenarios tested in the Evans Audits.
Find Out How Your Retirement Plan Measures Up
Start with your own numbers and see what your Retirement Opportunity Audit finds.
Start My Retirement Analysis